Homosexuality in Nagaland: A Sociological Exploration

Main Article Content

Rongpangmen Jamir
Toshimenla Jamir

Abstract

This study examines the regulation and lived negotiation of homosexuality within the sociocultural and religious context of Nagaland, a tribal Christian-majority state in Northeast India. Although homosexuality exists across cultures, it remains highly stigmatized in Naga society, where patriarchal kinship structures, Christian moral frameworks, and communal norms collectively reinforce heteronormativity. Using a qualitative research design, in-depth interviews were conducted with 54 participants, including homosexual individuals, heterosexual respondents, and counselors from three urban centers. Thematic analysis reveals that societal attitudes toward homosexuality are shaped by religious morality, notions of natural order, and family expectations. Homosexual individuals commonly experience internalized stigma, identity conflict, and pressure to conform to heterosexual norms, often adopting strategies such as concealment, digital engagement, and lavender marriages. Online spaces function as critical sites of identity negotiation, but also expose individuals to health risks and exploitation. The findings highlight how sexuality is regulated through everyday mechanisms of kinship surveillance, moral discourse, and shame rather than formal institutional control. The study contributes to sociological understandings of heteronormativity in tribal contexts and underscores the need for culturally sensitive mental health services, inclusive healthcare access, and community-based awareness initiatives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Homosexuality in Nagaland: A Sociological Exploration. (2026). Indian Journal of Health, Sexuality and Culture, 12(01), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.21590/

References

Indian Kanoon. Section 377 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Internet]. [cited 2026 Mar 4]. Available from: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1836974/

Greenberg DF. The construction of homosexuality. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 1988.

Ganna A, Verweij KJH, Nivard MG, Maier R, Wedow R, Busch AS, et al. Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior. Science. 2019;365(6456):eaat7693. doi:10.1126/science.aat7693.

American Psychological Association. Understanding sexual orientation and homosexuality [Internet]. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2008 Oct 29 [cited 2026 Mar 4]. Available from: https://www.apa.org/topics/lgbtq/orientation

World Association for Sexual Health. WAS statement: homosexuality is not a disease [Internet]. 2011 Jul 5 [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://www.worldsexualhealth.net/post/homosexuality-is-not-a-disease

Verstraete BC, Provencal VL, editors. Same-sex desire and love in Greco-Roman antiquity and in the classical tradition of the West. London: Routledge; 2013. doi:10.4324/9781315863993.

Finnis JM. Law, morality, and sexual orientation. Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy. 1995;9(1):11-40.

Berliner AK. Sex, sin, and the church: the dilemma of homosexuality. J Relig Health. 1987;26(2):137-42. doi:10.1007/BF01533684.

Joshi V. Nagaland and Nagas of Manipur. In: Berg encyclopedia of world dress and fashion: South Asia and Southeast Asia. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc; 2010. p. 205-11. doi:10.2752/BEWDF/EDch4028.

Nkosi S, Masson F. Christianity and homosexuality: contradictory or complementary? A qualitative study of the experiences of Christian homosexual university students. S Afr J High Educ. 2017;31(4):72-93. doi:10.20853/31-4-891.

Kwok DK, Wu J. Chinese attitudes towards sexual minorities in Hong Kong: implications for mental health. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(5):444-54. doi:10.3109/09540261.2015.1083950.

Gupta S. Queer theory: origin and development. Int J Engl Lang Lit Transl Stud. 2017;4(1):293-8.

Nickerson C. Symbolic interactionism theory & examples [Internet]. Simply Psychology; 2025 Mar 3 [cited 2026 Mar 4]. Available from: https://www.simplypsychology.org/symbolic-interaction-theory.html

Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. J Risk Uncertain. 1988;1(1):7-59. doi:10.1007/BF00055564.

Bromley E. Shame as a moral mood in medicine. J Eval Clin Pract. 2022;28(5):899-908. doi:10.1111/jep.13708.

Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. C-01: Population by religious community, Nagaland - 2011 [Internet]. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2011 [cited 2026 Mar 4]. Available from: https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/11386

The Holy Bible: King James Version. London: Collins’ Clear-Type Press; 1952.

National AIDS Control Organisation; ICMR-National Institute for Research in Digital Health and Data Science. India HIV estimates 2023: technical report [Internet]. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2024 [cited 2026 Mar 4]. Available from: https://www.naco.gov.in/documents?page=1

Press Trust of India. HIV/AIDS infected orphans a neglected lot [Internet]. NDTV; 2009 Apr 7 [cited 2026 Mar 4]. Available from: https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/hiv-aids-infected-orphans-a-neglected-lot-390936